Mass, Holy Communion, Eucharist, the Lord's Supper, Breaking of Bread are names for a ceremony that almost all Christian denominations celebrate. Every denomination that practices this rite includes the use of bread and wine NOTE 1 saying that bread represents Christ's body, and wine represents Christ's blood. They then eat the bread and drink the wine. Malicious rumour in the pagan Roman Empire spread accusations that the Christians engaged in cannibalism, and it's not hard to understand why this slander was believed. Even symbolically, eating human flesh and drinking blood is a gory concept.
Miracle
Sadly, Christians have often argued about the
meaning of the Lord's Supper. Roman Catholics NOTE 2 teach that the symbols are miraculously changed into the actual body and
blood of Christ, whilst keeping the form and taste of bread and wine NOTE 3. Although most Protestants reject that view and
regard the bread and wine as symbols, even Martin Luther argued that Christ's words were "This is my body..." so (said Luther)
it must be more than a symbol. It's a puzzling argument. In my view, a transformation that can't be seen doesn't qualify
as a miracle. Despite using different titles and varied details of how they do it, all agree that Communion is important.
Why is that?
Problem
There is a sizeable minority of Christians who
decline taking Communion. Some believe that the ritual should only take place at Easter. Some feel that the Last Supper
ritual was not meant to be repeated. Some feel unworthy to engage in it, either because they feel disqualified because of
actual, recent sin, but some because of an inappropriate sense of guilt NOTE 4. Some disengage because they are uncomfortable
about priesthood, and I counted myself among that group for a time. I wanted to emphasise that the death of Jesus was a
"once for all" NOTE 5 and "perfect" NOTE 6 sacrifice that can never be repeated. I found it easier to engage when the symbols were
shared hand-to-hand among the assembled worshippers as equals before God. But it remained a problem to me for several
years.
Odd
The story of the Last Supper is told in all four
Gospels, and "breaking bread" is frequently mentioned in the book of Acts. The words Jesus spoke over those simple,
everyday elements were enigmatic NOTE 7. St Paul describes the ceremony in such detail that the practice must have been
well-established in his time. But, if you view it in simple terms, it's an odd ceremony. The mystery is increased
by Paul's comment about people who observe the ceremony "in an unworthy manner" NOTE 8, a factor that worries some people.
However, it's not that Communion is magical event that can damage us, but that the Cross, which it reminds us of,
is our protection from the corrosive forces of guilt, fear, and self-loathing.
Prophetic
Communion is familiar to most Christians,
but why did Jesus institute this symbolic act? He foretold his violent death several times, but the disciples failed to
understand him. Why couldn't he just tell them again? Symbolism is part of the answer. We remember pictures more
easily than words, and the Last Supper was outstandingly memorable. It was simple in its imagery, graphic in its
symbolism, and critical in its timing. Jesus knew that, within hours of this Passover meal, his disciples would
face one of the greatest ordeals of their life. The prophetic ritual and its fulfilment would be so bound together
in their minds that they would be certain to tell the story - and it was essential that they should.
Provocative
Consider the circumstances leading
up to this event. Jesus knew that Jerusalem was the most dangerous place he could go to. As he entered the city,
he performed the deliberately provocative act of riding into the royal city on a donkey to fulfil a well-known
messianic prophecy. He drew attention to himself even more provocatively by turning over the tables of the merchants
and money changers in the Temple. This was so inflammatory that the temple authorities were bound to attack him.
He obviously wanted to be noticed. The authorities weren't sure what he looked like (they couldn't track him on CCTV!)
When they set out to arrest him, they needed a traitor to identify him - so he could easily have run away and hidden.
Was he rashly gambling that his followers might rise up violently under his leadership? NOTE 9 Or did he really intend to
be captured, tried, and executed? The Last Supper answers those questions.
Voluntary
The enigmatic parable-in-action that
we call the Last Supper is absolute proof that Jesus made a deliberate, purposeful choice to go to the cross. The
death of Jesus was not the tragic end to a noble mission, but the core objective of his life. By acting out this
prediction of his execution he was making sure that the disciples understood that his sacrifice was voluntary.
Not only that, but that it was the core and centre of the gospel they should teach after he left them. He was
neither a helpless victim, nor a failed rebel leader, nor a hapless martyr. Rather, he was consciously motivated
by a divine mission. His suffering was real and agonising, but his expectation was victory snatched from the jaws
of defeat. "For the joy set before him he endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand
of the throne of God." NOTE 10 .
Centre
We shouldn't overlook the significance
of his timing; Passover was an act of remembrance, and so was the ritual Jesus performed at that Last Supper.
St Paul summed it up in those memorable words, "...whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim
the Lord's death..." NOTE 11. Some scholars have defined Jesus' mission as an attempt to improve humanity by promoting
good behaviour. It wasn't. Without the Last Supper we would be less clear about his true object. We would be
looking on him as one more wise teacher who came to a sad end. But, by instituting this memorial, Jesus proved
that his death didn't shatter his plans - it fulfilled them. He intended to die. Without Communion, we would
be reading the parables and teachings of Jesus in much the same way as we read Aesop's fables. Communion doesn't
create, provide, or renew salvation. It reminds us of it. Through this ritual, Jesus put the cross at the centre
of the Christian message. You can't have Christianity without the cross.
Understand
I re-engaged with Communion
some years ago, but that doesn't mean that I understand it - not really
I do understand that it was an essential act and that repeating it is a vital reminder of what Jesus did for us.
I don't understand his willingness to leave realms of glory to take on human form.
I don't understand his grace that, having become man, caused him to accept death - even the torture of crucifixion.
I don't understand but, faced with a love that great, I can only wonder again and again, each time I take Communion.